|
Report
on
the Second Moscow Earth Charter Roundtable
March
8-10, 1998
Introduction
The Second Moscow Earth Charter Roundtable took place in Moscow on March
8-10, 1998. About 35 people from Russia, USA, Australia, Japan, France,
Great Britain (list attached) took part in the meeting.
The agenda included:
1) General discussion on various issues, including differences in various
positions such as the Benchmark Draft, Pierre Calame's variant, the French
position, Green Cross Earth Charter Philosophy, the ARC conception, the
Universal Declaration on Human Responsibilities and others.
2) Roundtable on scientific aspects of the Earth Charter
3) Roundtable on religious aspects of the Earth Charter.
4) General discussion including the issues related to the (a) structure,
(b) character,
and (c) content of the Charter and the prospects of the development of
the Earth Charter and organization of consultations at regional and national
levels, including public hearings.
I.
On methodological approaches towards the Earth Charter (moderator: Steven
Rockefeller, Rustem Khairov) the following reports were made:
1. Steven Rockefeller reported on the drafting process and plans to produce
a Benchmark Draft II. A succinct history of work that led to the production
of the Benchmark Draft I was also given.
2. Bertrand Charrier, Executive Director of Green Cross International,
discussed their Earth Charter plans, including a special forum to be held
in Kyoto in April of this year.
3. Pierre Calame gave an account of the work of his Alliance and his vision
that each principle on the Earth Charter should be articulated in terms
of the player it affects, and the domains of activity they influence.
Pierre then presented a sophisticated framework based on his experience
with the work of the Alliance. He agreed to provide the drafting team
with a document summarizing his recommendations.
4. John Hoyt, Chair of the USA National Committee for the Earth Charter,
outlined the approach they are taking to promote the Earth Charter. This
included getting commitment from representatives to engage their sectors
about the Benchmark Draft and to relate its principles to their spheres
of influence.
5. Dr. Brendan Mackey, in his capacity as Chair of the Australian National
Committee for the Earth Charter, outlined the four components of their
program, namely: (a) a youth program, based on a Curriculum Stimulus Book
that will be sent to every school in Australia; (b) a Community Consultation
Program; (c) a National Forum; and (d) a media campaign designed both
to promote the other components, and provide opportunities for direct
input from individuals. Considerable input is being sought from private
sector sponsorship.
6. Shoo Iwasaki, President of Green Cross Japan, spoke of the need for
a Charter that can elicit an emotional response from people. The Kyoto
conference on global warming lacked this inspirational dimension.
7. Rustem Khairov made a brief presentation on classification of the existing
methodological approaches.
8.
Gennadi Alferenko announced a major new initiative for the Russian Earth
Charter Committee. This involves the need to promote sustainable development
in Russia's wild but oil-rich northern territories. The idea is that regional
planning and management will be established based on the principles of
the Earth Charter. The Governor of Kamchatka has agreed to help form a
team that will develop strategies for implementing Earth Charter principles
at the regional level to promote sustainable living and environmental
protection.
For this discussion a report prepared by Dr Ruud Lubbers and Dr Patricia
Morales on Global principles - comparative analysis of the documents related
to the Earth Charter.
M.Gorbachev took an active part in the discussions.
As the results of the intensive discussion the participants came to share
the opinion that their positions had much in common. It was agreed that
there needed to be a major epmphasis on articulating the scientific principles
undrepinning the necessity of the Earth Charter. The necessity of a set
of three documents within the Earth Charter as a whole was confirmed.
The participants also agreed that at present there is no acceptable variant
of the Earth Charter and much more serious work remains to be done.
II.
Scientific Basis to the Earth Charter (moderator: Kim Losev, Brendan Mackey)
1. V. Gorshkov and Anastasia Makarieva, on behalf of Professors Gorshkov
and Losev, gave a presentation on "The theory of Biotic Regulation
for the Earth Charter", illustrated by results of empirical analyses.
This represents the accumulative insights of around twenty years' work
for these scientists and their colleagues.
Their work highlights the role played by the biota and ecological processes
in regulating Earth's environment. While this general point is generally
accepted by the broader scientific community, their work provides an explicit
theoretical framework for explaining these phenomena, and for making predictions
about human impact on the environment that can be empirically tested.
This means we do not have to simply accept their word; rather their theory
can be tested using data collected from the real world.
A key point is that this natural capacity for environmental regulation
is degraded in landscapes dominated by modern, industrial society. It
follows that a minimum amount of Earth's terrestrial lands must be maintained
in a natural condition. By "natural" we mean as free as possible
from the impacts of modern, technological society.
If the theory and the predictions of Gorshkov and his colleagues are correct,
there are profound implications for humanity. For example, there would
be a direct conflict between developing land for agriculture,settlement,
industry, etc., and maintaining the Biosphere's environmental regulatory
capacity.
While details of their theory and analyses are still the subject of scientific
debate (largely because the western scientific community has yet to fully
absorb and respond to this work), there would be general support for the
fundamental implications that flow from their work, including:
- Earth's
environment (as defined by factors such as the chemistry composition
of the atmosphere, the flow and quality of water, soil fertility)
has become and remains a suitable home for humans only because of
ongoing interactions between the biota and the physical environment
- the
integrity of these ecological processes much be maintained in order
to meet human needs as the global life support systems they generate
cannot be replaced by technology
- there
are conflicts to resolve between promoting human activity at the local
scale to meet short term human needs, and the scientifically-based
imperative to modify these activities to meet the longer-term human
need of protecting globally-scaled ecological functions.
The
Forum agreed that such fundamental scientifically-based knowledge should
be incorporated into the Charter. The challenge is to derive a suitable
set of relevant principles for guiding human behavior based on this scientific
understanding that will match the intended structure and character of
the Charter. Additional actions are needed to focus further discussion
and development of this important component of the Charter during the
next meetings on the Earth Charter (USA, Australia, Japan).
Dr. Brendan Mackey, who is assisting Professor Rockefeller on the Earth
Charter drafting team, agreed to work closely with Professors Gorshkov
and Losev to develop appropriate strategies.
Special time was given for the presentation of the latest research in
the sphere of nana-technologies for the issues of biotic regulation, as
well as other environmentally sound technologies made by President of
the International Foundation "Conversion", professor M.Ananyan.
III.
Religious Basis to the Charter
(moderator: Metropolitan Pitirim, John Hoyt)
Presentations were given by the following representatives:
1. Metropolitan of Volokolamsk and Yurievsk Pitirim
The Metropolitan affirmed the fundamental religious concept that views
the world as a united, integrated system, and noted that the world is
sensitive to moral changes. He presented a conceptual model based on the
image of a triangular pyramid. At the apex is God as the source. The lower
horizontal plane has three points that are God's manifestation on Earth,
represented by Ethics, Ecology, and Economy. Rising from the center of
this plane is Humankind. Human happiness comes from integrating these
three points and moving up the central axis closer to the God source.
The Metropolitan also noted the ecological dimension to the Bible's adage
that six years of work is to be followed by one year of rest. Further,
Earth is not a passive but rather is an active element of cooperation
with Humanity. We should use positive experiences from the world's religions
to develop the Earth Charter.
2. Mr Antonov (Old Believers)
While our relation to nature must change, we should not think of this
as a revolution--there is no place for revolution in the Third Millennium.
Traditional religions are ecologically pure, and there are traditional
values we need to draw upon in redefining our relationship with nature.
We should not forget the joy in people's hearts that derives from being
surrounded by nature. This is at least equally as important as the utility
we derive from nature.
3. Rabbi Kogan Zinovy Lvovich (Judaism)
God is the source of all laws. In Jewish tradition, the root of the name
'Adam' refers to the 'land.' The main commandments refer to Man's relation
to the land. While God created Man as possessor of the world, he also
created him with an angelic essence-and hence his fundamental nature is
to do good. Russia is the biggest country in the world and hence has a
special responsibility for what is happening to Earth. We need to work
out fundamental principles that all people can
relate to. There is a great need to engage a wide audience for the Charter
and the media can help do this. A suggested slogan for the Charter is
"Watch out! We have the world under our feet!"
4. Dalai- Lama representative in Moscow (Buddhism) expressed support for
the Earth Charter project and the Benchmark Draft.
5. Pudov Vladimir (Head of the Evangelic-Lutheran Church of Moscow) expressed
general agreement with the positive comments on the Earth Charter stated
by other speakers. He noted that God created Earth, so while Man likes
to view himself as master of the universe, he cannot do what he likes
and must respect Earth's carrying capacity and think about the consequences
of what he is doing.
6. Fazlun Khalid, Alliance of Religion and Conservation (ARC), Islamic
spokesperson
Traditionally there was an unconscious acceptance that humanity lived
with the natural order. However, this is now broken, as materialism is
now "God." So we need to retrace our steps back to the original
position with the help of the Earth Charter.
There are four Islamic principles relevant to the Earth Charter:
- the
principle of Unity (between the Creator and the Universe)
- the
principle of Origination (i.e., humans originated with the original
creation)
- the
principle of Balance (the interconnectedness and balance of creation)
- the
principle of Responsibility (humans' responsibility to maintain the
balance)
6.
Richard M. Clugston, Center for Respect of Life and Environment:
The Center has been organizing an annual forum in Assisi, Italy, along
the theme of "Spirituality and Sustainability." This theme is
important because the environmental crisis at its roots is a spiritual
crisis. But the Earth Charter cannot be dominated by any one group's spirituality.
Rather, it must reflect all authentic calls to the spirit. The suggestion
was also made that the Earth Charter could also be connected to the Roman
Catholic Church's Jubilee. The focus for this year meeting in Assisi wil
be the Earth Charter.
7. Professor Steven Rockefeller
Professor Rockefeller noted that the following universal spiritual attitudes
and ethical values were already in the Charter: humility; reverence for
life; gratitude, thankfulness; social and ecological responsibility; respect
for human dignity; commitment to social justice; equitable sharing of
wealth; overcoming poverty; promoting an attitude/culture of non-violence
and peace; the need to integrate knowledge with compassion; the "Golden
Rule."
8. D.Karimova viewed the Earth Charter from the point of the legislative
activity on land and stressed the necessity and the possibility of using
the principles of the Earth Charter in the real everyday program of agricultural
states.
9. N.Stomakhina:
Rather than the Earth Charter referring to "sharing" resources
and environmental benefits "fairly," it should refer to the
"rights" of people to resources and environmental benefits as
this will provide a much stronger basis for legislation and action.
The development of technology needs to be guided by environmental principles.
The Forum's attention was drawn to the work of the Russian scientist Vernadsky
and his theory of the Noosphere, and emphasis this gave to the interdependence
of all things.
The
dynamic development of human society must be connected to universal values.
Given this and the spiritual basis of our environmental crisis, interfaith
relations are an important component of sustainable development.
10. Professor Kim Losev
No religion supports robbing the environment the way we are currently
doing. All civilizations are based on the environment, and science can
help us understand this dependency. If the aim of the Charter is to change
behavior, then science can work with religion to do this. But we must
reach the youth if we wish to influence people's values and their behavior.
11. Pierre Calame
The Earth Charter document should comprise principles and an explanatory
section. The latter should detail (a) where the Charter came from, and
(b) where it is going.
The Charter must not simply preach. Rather, the Charter must be based
on commitment. In the case of institutions, such as religions, this commitment
must be commensurate with their responsibility. The capacity for the Charter
to evoke commitment will reflect the extent to which it is grounded in
reality.
Religion is one important source of values for the Earth Charter.
A tension can be found in religious thought between (a) man as part of
creation and (b) man as having dominion over creation. Nonetheless, religion
has an important role to play in the Earth Charter. In the end, the most
important thing is the "change in mind" required to bring about
change in the world. We must recognize that "freedom" only exists
within the context of a social alliance/contract, that is, with consideration
for other people's rights.
In
summary, the main points of agreement from the discussion on the religious
basis of the Charter were:
1. The Earth Charter provides a vital tool and the best available common
ground for interfaith/interdenominational dialogue.
2. The principles enunciated in the Benchmark Draft are consistent with
the fundamental value systems of the participants' religions.
3. At the heart of our environmental crisis lies a spiritual crisis.
Therefore, the Earth Charter must adequately reflect humanity's spiritual
dimension. Further dialogue is necessary for strengthening and clarifying
of the spiritual dimensions of the Charter.
4. The organized religions can play a critical role in both the development
and promulgation of the Earth Charter.
VI. Within the frameworks of the final general discussion on the Earth
Charter consultation process at the national level and on prospects of
the development of the Earth Charter project the following participants
in particular took the floor:
1. John Hoyt spoke about the process and the results of the national hearings
on the Earth Charter in the USA. He enumerated the main conclusions out
of the public hearings, emphasizing the fact that no integrated Earth
Charter variant could as yet be elaborated.
2. Brendan Mackey told about the work of the National Committee on the
Earth Charter of Australia.
3. Rustem Khairov informed the participants about the work done by the
Russian National Committee in Russia and the CIS countries.
4. Mikhail Gorbachev proposed to put emphasis on main directions on perfectioning
the text and the structure of the Charter and proposed his vision of the
document, in particular,
- preamble (emotional, inspiring and easy to understand to every person
on Earth).
- main text, explaining the missions and the objectives of the Charter
and the necessity of accepting certain limitations and the responsibilities.
- values, principles for behavior and moral-ethical directions resulting
from the essence of the Earth Charter.
- mechanisms of social control, providing the realizations of these principles.
M.Gorbachev emphasized that such a structure does not presuppose certain
sections of the document, but just the logic of the document for all layers
of the world's society.
Apart from that the following matters were touched upon: the opportunities
of having contact with "wild, Virgin" nature and the existence
of certain laws of its conservation (A.Makarieva), changing several terms
(for example, the term of "sustainable living" seems more appropriate
than the term "sustainable development", the necessity of elaboration
of the laws on clean information environment, and primarily, on advertising,
on mass media, education (Evgeny Faidysh)
Conclusions
and Recommendations
1. National committees in Russia, the United States, and Australia have
developed and are implementing significant Earth Charter programs. The
Russian Committee for the Earth Charter is implementing an innovative
plan to incorporate the Earth Charter into Regional Economic Development
plans to promote sustainable development and environmental protection.
The idea is that regional government will sign on to the Earth Charter
and planning and management in accordance with its principles. Discussions
are currently being held with the Governor of Kamchatka to implement this
initiative in that region. The Russian Earth Charter
Committee will be working on this project in collaboration with Pierre
Calame's Alliance Project.
2. The Earth Charter must reflect a synthesis of scientific knowledge
about Earth's ecology and the impact of humans, together with values that
reflect spiritual, social, and other dimensions of the human condition.
3. The Earth Charter must concentrate on articulating fundamental universal
principles.
4. The Charter must be considered in the context of the International
Environmental Covenant being developed by the IUCN Commission on Environmental
Law together with other IUCN Commissions. The Covenant will give a formal
legal rendering to the Charter's principles.
5. It was recommended that the Charter have the following structure:
- an introduction or Preamble that conveys the keystone concept in an
inspirational form
- the scientific component of the Charter must be clearly expressed as
it is central to the aims of environmental protection
- no more than two pages of principles expressed in simple language, readily
comprehended by everyday people
- an explanatory section is also needed that (a) provides some interpretation,
(b) gives examples of their application, and (c) details mechanism for
their implementation and promulgation
6.
The following activities are identified as important steps in the ongoing
developments of the Earth Charter process:
- Green Cross International is hosting a meeting on the Earth Charter
in Kyoto, Japan, on 7 April, following their General Assembly.
- Two additional meetings are being planned by the Australian, Russian,
and United States committees one to be held in Russia, and one in the
US) that will include
significant components that relate to the scientific dimensions of the
Earth Charter.
- The Australian Earth Charter program will be launched in July this year.
7. The Earth Charter provides an invaluable platform for interfaith/interdenominational
dialogue. A spiritual crisis lies at the heart of our environmental crisis.
Further dialogue is required, however, to clarify and strengthen the Charter's
spiritual dimension.
8. The Forum expressed its confidence in the work of Professor Steven
Rockefeller and his drafting team.
President of GCI Gorbachev underlined the importance of the work maintained
by Dr Steven Rockefeller and his readiness to assist in the promotion
and the realization of the project.
Professor Rockefeller has established an open drafting process that ensures
the many voices are being heard and that helps to integrate them in a
single document.
Professor Rockefeller believes that there will be a draft of Benchmark
Draft II ready for perusal in two to three months' time. The drafting
team is meeting in Middlebury the week starting 13 March to consider the
many suggestions, recommendations, and comments that have been received
to date.
In conclusion President Gorbachev summarized the opinions of the participants
underlining the fact that the Earth Charter must show the way ahead for
a new human civilization, a new paradigm for human development and progress.
This new code of principles must include ecological law, in support of
existing laws, governing humanity's relations with nature. The Earth Charter
must speak to all people, not just the intellectual elite, and cause vibrations
in people's spirits, in their hearts as well as their minds.
Acknowledgments
1. Special thanks are expressed to President Gorbachev for his participation
and the inspiration and leadership he brought to the Forum.
2. The participants of the Roundtable are grateful to the Chairman of
the State Committee of the Russian Federation on environmental protection
Victor Danilov-Danilyan for his participation in the opening of the Roundtable
and his assistance in its organization, and to Minister of the Moscow
Government on environmental issues L.Bochin for his support of the activities
of the Roundtable.
3. The participants of the Roundtable express their special gratitude
to the Chairman of the Board of the Foundation for Survival and Development
of Humanity Metropolitan Pitirim for his contribution to the work of the
Roundtable and his moral support, and to the Executive Director of the
Foundation Rustem Khairov and the staff of the Foundation for their organizational
efforts and the creative atmosphere for the success of this meeting.
4. We are grateful to the following organizations for the financial support
they gave to the Forum: The Center for Respect of Life and Environment,
and The Foundation for the Survival and Development of Humanity and the
Alliance for Religions and Conservation.
5. Special thanks are also expressed for the magnificent piano recital
performed at the Forum's reception by Ekaterina Richter.
Back
to Earth Charter
Contact
us at:
Copyright
© 14 oct 1998 Green Cross International, Geneva, Switzerland
|
 |