The Legacy Program:

Projects 1994-1998


Basel, 23 April 1999

Radleg

Radleg collects and compiles data on location, size, and scale of nuclear contamination of the environment as a result of the military use of nuclear materials, and advocates clean-up priorities.

  • Radleg-0 (1994-1995): Assessment of the impact of the nuclear tests in Semipalatinsk on nature and population of the Altay Region. Data like distribution of fall-out; nuclide contents in plants, soils and water; general health state; settlements; or hydrogeology, were integrated into a Geographical Information System and a database. A technical report was published in Russian and English.
  • Radleg-1 (1995-1996): Assessment of the impact of the plutonium breeding facility in Krasnoyarsk-26 on environment and population health, discussion of the safety of the underground repository, and measurement of the nuclear contamination of the Jenissei river. Data was integrated into a Geographical Information System and a database. A technical report was published in Russian and English.
  • Radleg-2 (1995-1996): The north-west region of Russia is home to the nuclear Northern Fleet, the Federal Nuclear Test Site in Novaya Zemlya as well as different wharves for nuclear vessels. An investigation of the health and environmental consequences, and a risk assessment of possible nuclear accidents was conducted. Data was integrated into a Geographical Information System and a database. A technical report was published in Russian and English.
  • Radleg-3 (1996-1997): Investigation of the impact of the operation of the nuclear Pacific Fleet on environment and health in the Vladivostok Area. A section is dedicated to the submarine accident in Bolshoi Kamen. Data was integrated into a Geographical Information System and a database. A technical report was published in Russian and English.
  • Radleg-4 (1996-1997): Assessment of the impact on environment and population health of the plutonium breeding facility in Tomsk, its underground repository, and of the April 1993 accident. Data was integrated into a Geographical Information System and a database. A technical report was published in Russian and English.
  • Radleg book (1998): The book summarizes, in a non-technical form, the results of Radleg-0 to Radleg-4 and features several guest contributions. Sections deal with Novaya Zemlya (bomb tests); North-West Russia (nuclear fleet); Moscow (R&D); Chelyabinsk, Tomsk and Krasnoyarsk (plutonium breeding); Altai (bomb tests); and Vladivostok (nuclear fleet). The publication addresses Russian authorities and decision-makers as well as academic institutions.

Chemtrust

Chemtrust facilitates chemical weapons destruction through information of and mediation between citizens and the army, independent scientific investigations on debated issues, and social-medical projects in favor of stockpile communities.

  • Chemtrust-1 (1995): Risk assessment of the chemical weapons stockpile in Kambarka (Ural region, Russia). Evaluation of different accident scenarios and the impact on the nearby city. Publication of a monograph, information on the WWW. The results were integrated in an information booklet describing the correct behavior in case of an emergency. The booklet was distributed to the population of Kambarka.
  • Chemtrust-2 (1995-1996): Investigation of an often-claimed impact of the Gorny chemical weapons stockpile and the Shichany R&D facility (both Saratov region, Russia) on public and especially children's health. Development of new concepts of treatment of the observed atypical chronic diseases.
  • Chemtrust-3 (1996): Risk assessment of the chemical weapons stockpile in Kizner (Ural region, Russia). Evaluation of different accident scenarios and the impact on the nearby city. Publication of a monograph, information on the WWW. The results were included in an information booklet for the population of Kizner.
  • Chemtrust-4 (1997-1998): The treatment of poisoning inflicted by chemical weapons as well as the emergency preparedness of stockpile communities requests specific and not widely available expertise. Green Cross experts trained personnel in 5 of 7 Russian stockpile communities in the frame of 10-days courses on medical and emergency issues (Shchuch‘ye, Kizner, Kambarka, Pochep, Penza). A centralized course in Moscow gathered the heads of medical departments of different regions. The relevant experience gathered in the courses currently helps the Russian Ministry of Public Health to draft necessary new legislation and training curricula for people working at the future chemical weapons destruction facilities. In addition, the training material used in the frame of the courses is requested by hospitals from all over Russia.
  • Chemtrust-5 (1997-1998): Investigation of a former chemical weapons destruction site in Penza (middle Volga basin, Russia). Analysis of soil samples from the open pit burning site showed arsenic concentrations exceeding permissible levels by 3'000-65'000 times, traces of mustard gas and its products of transformation, as well as dioxins and furanes (200'000-500'000 permissible levels). The analyses of water samples showed a migration of the substances to the only drinking water reserve of Penza. 2-3 other similar destruction sites are suspected. Publication of a 100-page final report (see www.gci.ch).
  • CTR-1/7 (1997): Epidemiological investigation of the general health state, the children health state and the condition of the medical services in the Shchuch'ye district (Western Siberia, Russia).
  • CTR-1/9 (1997): Risk comparison of continued storage vs. destruction of the Shchuch'ye chemical weapons stockpile (Western Siberia, Russia). Evaluation of the consequences of different accident scenarios. Publication of the results in an information booklet for the population of Shchuch'ye.
  • CTR-2/7 (1998): A main concern of citizens living around chemical weapons stockpile is a possible impact of the stored weapons on their health. An investigation, in collaboration with the Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine (University of Basel, Switzerland), explored whether any conclusion about such a link is possible in view of the quality of the existing epidemiological data and the present state of the Russian health system.
  • Organisation of six public hearings:
    • Saratov (October 1995): The first Green Cross Russia public hearing addressed the decreed destruction of the Gorny chemical weapons stockpile, but also the regional problems related to the Shichany chemical weapons R&D facility and test ground. A final document was approved, and Russian proceedings with English summaries were published.
    • Izhevsk, Kambarka (14-16 May 1996): The second Russian public hearing, co-organized with the authorities of the Udmurt Republic, discussed issues related to the planned chemical weapons destruction facility in Kambarka. A one-day visit to Kambarka allowed local citizens to directly express their concerns and views to the decision-makers. A final document was approved, Russian and English proceedings were published.
    • Washington (July 1996): GGUSA hosted a hearing on Capitol Hill that brought together, for the first time, U.S. and Russian military officials, chemical weapons experts, and citizen activist groups to address the need for safe, environmentally sound, and cost-effective chemical weapons destruction. A concise report with consensus action items and edited transcripts was produced.
    • Indianapolis (December 1996): The GGUSA Legacy Program hosted the first public hearing on new U.S. Army recommendations on how to proceed with the destruction of chemical weapons at the Newport Chemical Depot in Indiana. The hearing brought together concerned citizens, military personnel, and government officials at the Indiana State Capitol.
    • Shchuch'ye, Kurgan (8-10 July 1997): Green Cross Russia's third public hearing was mandated by the Russian Chemical Forces. Several hundred participants, representing local citizens, Russian and American authorities, the army and academic institutions, discussed a comprehensive list of subjects related to the construction of a chemical weapons destruction facility in Shchuch'ye. A final document was approved, Russian and English proceedings were published.
    • Kizner, Izhevsk (26-27 May 1998): In the frame of the fourth Russian public hearing, authorities presented to several hundred citizens their plans for the future Kizner chemical weapons destruction facility. Main groups of questions raised centered on the general state of health and the emergency preparedness of the community, but also on job opportunities at the future facility and infrastructure investments. A final document was approved, Russian and English proceedings were published (available at www.gci.ch).
  • Public outreach offices (since 1997): Green Cross Russia's public outreach offices in Shchuch’ye, Kurgan, Penza, Pochep, and Kizner, are visited each month by hundreds of citizens looking for information on their nearby chemical weapons stockpile and the Federal Destruction Program. A series of more than twenty brochures and fact sheets, as well as audio-visual material, has been produced in answer to citizen's main concerns and questions. The office staff actively attends community meetings, visits remote settlements, briefs the mass media, and organizes quarterly lecture tours bringing key decision-makers directly to the stockpile communities.
  • A key issue today in chemical weapons disarmament is the involvement of citizens in the decision making process. The USA and Europe know different successful models, from which the Russian process could profit. In preparation of a workshop on Citizen Advisory Commissions in Moscow, GGUSA has researched the experience of more than 25 citizens' groups, and prepared a workshop document summarizing basic ground rules, structures and main lessons learned.
  • Over the years, several roundtables were organized in the U.S. on chemical weapons destruction, defense environmental clean-up and base conversion. Participants included representatives from the Department of Defense, Army, Air Force, Navy, Environmental Protection Agency and community groups.
  • GGUSA has participated since 1998 as one of the three national environmental and arms control organizations in the national ‘Dialogue on Assembled Chemical Weapons Assessment’ (DACWA) for the AltTech II program of the U.S. Army. It was selected as one of four members of the Citizens' Advisory Technical Team to be actively engaged in the proprietary procurement process for chemical weapons destruction technologies.
  • Green Cross Russia acted as an official advisor to the Duma commission preparing the Russian chemical weapons destruction law (1996).
  • February 1997, GGUSA co-ordinated a coalition of major environmental groups in support to the Chemical Weapons Convention. A National Security Council meeting with environmental groups was facilitated in order to finalize specific conditions to the Resolution of Ratification for the Chemical Weapons Convention. A roundtable of environmental groups and arms control organizations was mediated. A mutual statement of support for the Chemical Weapons Convention and for continued research and development of alternative chemical weapons destruction technologies was delivered. Similar events were organized both by Green Cross Russia and Green Cross Switzerland ahead of the Russian ratification in November 1997.
  • On the 4th November 1998, Green Cross Russia organized a one-day Forum in Moscow to mark the first anniversary of the Russian ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention. All stakeholder groups (central ministries, regional authorities, army, scientific institutions, and NGOs) attended it. The Forum made a layout of all unresolved questions in the Russian chemical weapons destruction process. Several regions decided to draw, with the help of Green Cross Russia, investment plans in order to facilitate foreign investments in local infrastructure development. The missing investments in local infrastructure are a main obstacle today in the chemical weapons destruction process.

Conweap

Conweap promotes military base clean-up and conversion as well as the environmentally sound destruction of weapon inventories.

  • April-May 1996, GGUSA initiated a dialogue between state environmental regulators and high level Pentagon officials on Department of Defense clean-up policy and clean-up funding realignment.
  • Five annual Legacy Forums in the U.S. addressed issues related to the clean-up of military toxics and base conversion. Proceedings have been published. Participants included representatives of all military service branches, federal, state, and local government, and community organizations. GGUSA also participates in the National Dialogue on Military Munitions to help facilitate the development of ‚green munitions‘, the cleanup of unexploded ordnance, and appropriate management of firing ranges, and the demilitarization of weapons inventories.
  • Upon request by the Russian army, a mission to Pskov (Russian-Estonian border) in March 1998 investigated options to clean up a major kerosene spill at a military airport. In collaboration with the Institute for Terrestrial Ecology and Soil Biology of the ETH Zürich (Switzerland), remediation methods appropriate for Russian conditions should be introduced in the frame of a pilot project. Due to political problems out of our control the project had to be stalled, a substitute project on a strategic missile base is presently under evaluation.
  • Since 1995, GC Estonia runs a program for cleaning up the Baltic shorelines from unexploded ammunition. It also prepares a major inventory project which should compile all military legacy in Estonia (unexploded ammunition, spills, toxic waste).

Socmed

Socmed improves the public health services and social infrastructure in regions affected by former military activities.

  • Since 1995, Green Cross has organized therapy camps for children and their families living in the Chernobyl area or around chemical weapons stockpiles. Each year, 500-700 children can visit one of the camps in Belarus or Russia for 24 days. The camps’ program contains not only medical treatment but also environmental education and institution building.The more than 2 million people living in the Chernobyl Zone of Belarus have virtually no chance for being resettled. A mother and child program teaches food preparation techniques minimizing radio nuclide contents in home-grown foodstuff (garden plots are usually the only source of food for the entire family).


© GCI, June 1999 / Green Cross International / Geneva / Switzerland


ÿ