Mr. Carlsson
stressed the need for Global Governance, and for States involved in water
disputes to agree on solutions, mediation procedures, or arbitration. On
the institutional level, he believed the UN and other international bodies
should be more involved in security measures and preventive initiatives.
Mr. Ramos
introduced the different models of cooperation which we have outlined in
our report: cooperation in terms of allocation, for salvation and for opportunity.
He also raised the importance of poverty alleviation and environmental protection
as key issues in achieving both water and social security, and pointed out
the close link between water, education and survival.
Mr. Masire
began with the statement that the water in rivers belongs to all riparian
states, and that upper and lower states have equal claim. Water thus belongs
to all and the most proactive approach is to recognise this communal ownership
and share the water before fighting over it. He spoke particularly of Southern
Africa which is trying to be proactive and cooperative to relieve its thirst,
rather than waiting until states are forced into desperate measures to secure
water.
Prof. Asmal spoke of the need to protect
the sovereignty of small states, and convince all states that it is in their
vital interest to act together to remove threats of force. He raised the
point that we need to look beyond law to policy, and to enhance political
and public will through education and confidence building measures to install
the principle of solidarity between people and states.
During the question period the need to ratify the
UN Convention on Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses
(so far only ratified by South Africa, Syria, Finland and Sweden) was highlighted.
|