 |
FOCUS ON TRANSBOUNDARY CONFLICTS
Apparently, the most difficult problem in the Agenda is the transboundary
conflicts on water. We have done well by identifying all the
key principles and processes based on success stories.
We now have a road map with which we could lead conflicting interests
into common ground and agreements.
We should aim to create the institutions that will allow conflicting
countries to find a solution to their problems.
But is this is not possible now in any area for whatever reasons,
we should, at least, start the process.
My suggestion is to develop a corps of conflict resolution practitioners
and field them in all the transboundary areas that are potential,
or have become, flash points. There should be one such expert
team formed on every problem level, whose role is to listen,
get a measure of the conflicting interests and suggest options,
if asked for. But in no instance should "Outsiders",
as such experts may be perceived to be, try to impose a solution.
The solution that is sustainable must come from the stakeholders
themselves, when they are ready or when the crisis compels them
to act.
These field facilitators should help with a continuous flow of
fresh options that they can offer when negotiations are deadlocked,
but they should have a base of support.
There is a need for institutional support in various fields.
There is also a need for the stakeholders to recognize their
respective roles in the process, and it is in this area that
the funding agencies can help significantly.
There is further the need to document the process so that the
patterns of the conflict and probable areas of cooperation will,
in turn, define he features of the institutions that must be
put in place to pursue the process on a sustainable basis.
This iterative process, in contrast to the linear or planned
approach, may be long-winded and tedious. But it could eventually
bring out a depth of creativity and wealth of ideas that are
vital in providing solutions to contentious issues.
|