A VITAL PARADIGM SHIFT TO MAINTAIN HABITABILITY IN THE MIDDLE EAST:
THE INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSES
By Dr. Bertrand Charrier & Fiona Curtin

Water is one of the most critical issues which the people of the Jordan River Valley region will need to resolve in the very near future. High population growth and economic development will inevitably increase demand for the water of an already over-stretched ecosystem. Strictly nationally driven solutions to solve problems of water demand and supply, taken unilaterally by each of the region's countries, will inevitably result in continuing and severe tensions between them, as the water itself is taken from shared rivers and aquifers. Only the integrated, ecosystemic management of the international watercourses, based on a regional cooperation approach and with the broad endorsement of the people and the governments of the region can bring about a peaceful and sustainable solution to the problem of water scarcity. The region should be defined in a broad perspective, including Jordan, Israel, the Palestinian Authority Areas, Lebanon and Syria.

When it comes to water in the Middle East, sharing is the basis of survival and regional cooperation is the key to stability, growth and peace. As so much of the already scarce water available is of a transboundary nature, no one nation will be able to solve her water problems alone but will require regional solidarity. Feelings of deprivation are an unsustainable basis for any agreement and it is therefore reassuring that key decision-makers from across the region appear committed to discussing ways to amicably solve lingering water disputes. Any settlements which neglect the needs and entitlements of people to adequate water supplies, and propagate inequalities in distribution, will inevitably be unsustainable. Basin-wide action is therefore imperative and will install greater security and trust amongst the different inhabitants of the region. The delicate common ecosystems demand the greatest possible degree of cooperation between the different Peoples in the Middle East; the challenge of achieving effective regional water management must be faced.

It is widely agreed that the water issue has the potential to be the origin of either conflict or cooperation; one way to encourage the latter is through the identification of possible national projects which can have synergetic effects for regional water management and conservation. The fundamental question is how to reconcile all the parties' water priorities into a regional vision. Transparency, confidence building and public awareness are all essential to the development and achievement of any regional solution. To this end it is vital that any vision be formulated through the participation and ideas of as representative a group as possible from all parts of the region and the different stakeholder groups.

Water is a vital element in the continued economic development of the region and the improved living conditions of its people but the current water availability will not be able to accommodate any level of growth unless fundamental changes are made.

1. Water needs in the Jordan River Basin


United Nations projections estimate that the population of the Jordan Valley could reach 34 million by 2050, compared with 14.4 million today. In the wider region, including Lebanon and Syria, the population may reach 79 million by 2050, more than double the 33 million in 1998.

The finite amount of renewable freshwater available throughout the entire 'Jordan Valley Area' from rivers and renewable aquifers is only approximately 2,700 million cubic meters (1,400 groundwater and 1,300 surface water) per year at average sustainable yields. Data from 1994 shows that water consumption is already very low in the Jordan Valley Area: on average, Jordanians use 221 m3/person/year, Palestinians use 104, and Israelis use 359. Thus, the average for 'Jordan Valley Area' is only 262m3/person/year. These figures should be compared to the Minimum Water Requirement of 125M3/cap/yr that is needed to meet all of the basic hygienic, social and economic requirements for domestic/ urban/commercial/industrial uses, excluding agriculture, for a reasonably high standard of urban living in arid areas.

In the near future, the naturally available water will be just sufficient to meet the domestic and industrial needs of the population, with only a very limited quantity left for agriculture. There will also be very little available for the natural survival of the ecosystem. In regions where economic development based on industry and services is not sufficient, priority will always be given to fulfilling basic domestic needs and food production. The loser in this equation will be Nature and the sustainability of the regional ecosystem, threatening the habitability of the whole region.

Figures clearly show that without a concrete and large-scale regional strategy, current water shortage problems will reach crisis levels in the next 10-20 years, even without taking into account the severe droughts which are occurring more and more frequently. Even now, according to the 1998 GTZ study, there is a deficit of about 170 Mm3. Current water-extraction is also causing the unsustainable exploitation of groundwater resources. Growing demand is leading to a shrinking amount of water available per capita under existing systems of use, distribution and water supply. Distribution is a major issue, as even with equitable supply current disparities in distribution systems will ensure that many remain poorly serviced. This presents many opportunities for the private sector to have a role in the improvement of the water infrastructure in many areas.

1.1.1. Regional Cooperation
The idea of regional cooperation is rendered meaningless when in one part of a shared basin precious groundwater reserves are being over-exploited to grow water-intensive export crops, while elsewhere people do not have adequate, clean and reliable access to drinking water. What is needed is a regional commitment to sustainable and equitable water management. With proof of such a commitment will come security; and with security will come investment in the long-term projects required to improve the water situation for the people throughout the region.


1.2. Participation process
Water management is so intimately related to land-use, education and poverty-alleviation that decisions should as much as possible be in the hands of the people directly concerned. Public awareness and stakeholder participation regarding water decision-making at every level is so crucial that it is considered by many to be an emerging human right and an essential part of the democratic process. Private sector involvement and commitment to more efficient water management can be the key to achieving viable solutions to scarcity and water quality problems.


1.3. Sovereignty
The threat of a regional water crisis caused by the continued and widespread over-exploitation and pollution of water requires that a consensus be reached regarding the delicate balance between national sovereignty and the management of the network of shared underground and surface watercourses. The allocation of transboundary water resources necessitates the consideration of the limits of state sovereignty. National sovereignty involves more than the recognition of land borders, or allocations of authority, it involves also the domestic relations between the state and the people. Rigid interpretations of sovereignty over water contradict the very nature of water itself. Water flows across, and underneath, international boundaries, sustains entire ecosystems, is a fundamental component of many cultures and religions, and often dictates life-style choices. The question of who has the right, or entitlement, to what portion of water and for what purpose can be asked either at the level of riparian states or between different groups of people sharing a pump or a stream.
Ideally, national sovereignty should be a representative union between state and popular sovereignty, and thus is clearly a matter which goes well beyond international law to considerations of social security, human rights, political and public will, minorities, gender, culture and the environment, and calls for a change in the way water is valued and treated.


1.4. The power to control Watercourses
Water is a critical resource the possession of which confers power and summons many distinct images and significances for different people. Although water has been a political and military issue since antiquity, it is only in the 20th Century that we have developed the technical means to dramatically alter, store and divert the natural flow of rivers and tap the essential sources of deep underground water. This power has rested largely with state authorities, and the harnessing of water has become a vital component in the economic development of states. Now that states have the ability to abstract the entire volume of a transboundary river or aquifer, the questions remains as to what rights they have to the waters that flow through their territory, and what obligations they have to their fellow riparians, and to the people and environment of the entire basin in question.

 

1.5. Ratification of the UN Convention on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses
A comprehensive set of principles on how to share this precious resource should be developed, accepted and implemented. An excellent start would be the adoption of good water laws and priorities at the national level, but states who face a potentially thirsty future need also to look to their neighbours and develop agreements on protecting and fairly apportioning common watercourses and jointly developing ways to use their water more efficiently in order to pre-empt the crisis. A spirit of solidarity is required between up-stream and down-stream states, as well as the development of cross-border systems of compensation, trade-offs and information exchange, whether to deal with problems of scarcity, flooding or pollution. The ratification of the 1997 UN Convention on the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses would be a gesture of good will on the part of states, and could serve to remove the misplaced feelings of suspicion and insecurity which hinder the establishment of regional, basin level agreements. This should be seen as creating a system of effective interdependence, based on cooperation, sharing and a pooling rather than a restriction of each nation's sovereignty. Basin-wide cooperation entails opportunities for all, including the business sector, and provides the best chance for the protection of international watercourses for the benefit of future generations.

2. Integrated River Basin management


Green Cross International supports a vision of regional cooperation based on the concept of the unity of the river basin. The interdependencies in the hydraulic cycle dictate that any unilateral action to preserve shared water will be greatly limited in its effectiveness if not coordinated with the actions of fellow basin states. It seems so obvious, but the fact is that this principle and concept is not yet universally accepted. The water problem in the Jordan Valley and the whole Middle East has reached an extent beyond the scope of any individual state or people to solve. Basin-wide action is therefore imperative and will install greater security and trust amongst the different inhabitants of the region. National sovereignty should be used as a tool rather than a barrier in the integrated management of shared waters as the common ecosystem demands the greatest possible degree of cooperation between the different Peoples.

In the interest of everyone in the region, more efforts must be made towards greater cooperation to improve the daily lives of people during this transition period. Water is key to the economic development of the region and the advancement of its people; the current water availability will not be able to accommodate any level of growth under the existing allocation practices. Shared water creates a natural link which should be exploited to enhance all areas of cooperation. Effective integrated watercourses management requires a recognised institutional body with the adapted financial means to act. In future, a Regional River Basin Authority should be created in the framework of an international Convention on the Protection and Development of Jordan Valley Watercourses.

3. New Water Paradigm


In this region the link between water and people is primarily food. Therefore it is here that the key to Water for Peace in the Middle East lies. There will not be not enough water here to feed the population, and the continued demographic and economic expansion now requires that the region adopts a new water paradigm. This realisation is not new, but it is being accepted only very reluctantly.

3.1. Value of Water
What is in question is the value of water, and this is not an easy one to answer. A person's supply of essential drinking and domestic water is so valuable that many argue that it cannot and should not be priced. The water used to irrigate crops is only as valuable as the amount it would cost to import those crops from elsewhere, or alternatively the amount it would cost to desalinate the water needed to replace it; in neither of these cases is this amount high enough to warrant any level of dispute. Naturally occurring water must be used, as an absolute and regionally respected priority, for the domestic needs of all people and the preservation of the environment before it is allocated to any other purposes. This is true of any region, but is essential in fragile, arid environments like the Middle East.

The environment must be respected as a water user. Water scarcity has led to serious over-pumping of aquifers in the region beyond their recharge rates. Many of these aquifers are shared, and their permanent depletion could develop into a cause of conflict if not addressed. There are also widespread problems of land erosion, salt water intrusion in coastal areas and increased pressures from urbanisation. The fragile natural environment must be considered in any proposal as when properly managed it is both a water user and a water generator.

3.2. Full Cost Pricing of Water
Pricing water at what it costs to provide can increase access by those who need it, and prevent the poorest members of a society being forced to pay higher prices for water from private vendors. Pricing structures can also be designed to protect the interests of those who cannot afford to pay the full price. Pricing water encourages conservation and reuse and-in combination with the development of water markets--can facilitate the reallocation of water to the highest value use. This greater efficiency not only makes economic sense, it also, by reducing the total amount of resources used for human consumption, makes environmental sense.

Pricing water, establishing water markets and managing water resources for water supply, sanitation, irrigation, drainage and other human uses as "service businesses" will increase the involvement of the private sector. This has the potential to increase by orders of magnitude the funds available for investment and for research and development on water resources.

4. Water and Agriculture


First of all it is necessary to address the question of irrigated agriculture in the entire region as this is overwhelmingly the largest water user.

4.1. Importance of Agriculture in the economy
Certain sectors of the economies of the Palestinian Authority Areas, Israel and Jordan have already demonstrated that water resource-deficient regions can generate livelihoods and initiate development beyond that which stems from traditional rural activities. In Israel, agriculture accounts for only 3% of the GDP, yet water is still allocated in abundance for irrigation. Water is more than a simple liquid; in some circumstances it is also an economic good and as such it can be traded and substituted. Water can be made available to arid regions through the importation of agricultural products, and in particular food, far cheaper and with less hazardous consequences to the environment than attempts to produce the population's food requirements locally. This also frees large amounts of water for domestic, environmental and, once these needs are met, industrial and developmental activities. Water can be used far more efficiently, in terms of both income generation and employment opportunities, in business, services, tourism or manufacturing, thus increasing the nation's GDP and therefore the funds which they will need to purchase food via international markets. With greater economic productivity, a state can achieve total self-reliance and food security, which is more reliable and sustainable in an arid zone than attempts to achieve food self-sufficiency. All such major adjustments in a society must be accompanied by awareness raising and education programmes; no change will be sustainable if it out-runs a community's capacity to adapt to new circumstances.

4.2. Toward Regional Food Security
Urgent solutions are required, and any solution will necessarily involve a variety of measures as well as a drastic reappraisal of current agricultural practices. Many states in arid regions have already "run-out" of water in terms of being anywhere close to the ability to claim self-sufficiency in food production. Yet the ideal of self-sufficiency has so long been connected with state-security and independence that authorities are loath to admit this, thinking it would be "political suicide" and weaken their position in relation to other states. This is a paradigm which should be encouraged to shift if the political, social and environmental consequences of water scarcity are to be averted. The alternative, and preferable policy choice is that of food security. This option was long ago adopted by states such as Japan, Singapore and Malta, resulting in massive increases in the development and wealth of the countries as there are much "higher returns" to water in service and industrial sectors than in agriculture. In the Jordan Valley, the regional food security should be actively sought.

4.3. Virtual Water
The water embedded in food traded on international markets is know as "virtual water". The virtual water paradigm has been presented as a solution to the problem of balancing economic and population growth, ecological sustainability and the provision of an acceptable standard of living for all people. Importing virtual water is a way of achieving an equilibrium and therefore reconciling the sustainable development debate in the Middle East without curbing economic growth in the region. Food security and adequate supplies of water for domestic, industrial and certain agricultural needs can coexist under this new paradigm. Virtual water manages to reallocate the spatially unequal distribution of water resources by harnessing global soil water, mostly from temperate zones, for the benefit of all regions. There is almost no naturally occurring soil water in this part of the Middle East, which makes the use of natural surface and underground waters for irrigation an extremely expensive practice. Expensive in the sense that agriculture is not an efficient method of transforming scarce water resources into economic gains; expensive when considering that this water is currently being taken at a rate beyond that which can be naturally replenished; and, most of all, expensive in a region where not all people have access to clean water for drinking and sanitation.


4.4. Agricultural Biotechnology
In mid and long-term, agricultural biotechnology can also help to relieving the water crisis. The Jordan Valley farmers could produce more by, for example, developing new crop varieties that are drought-tolerant, resistant to insects and weeds, resistant to a certain level of salinity, and able to capture nitrogen from the air. Biotech can also make the foods farmers produce more nutritious by increasing the Vitamin A, iron and other nutrients in the edible portion of the plant. Modern biotechnology research, together with appropriate policies, better infrastructure and traditional research methods already developed in Israel in full cooperation with fellow riparian countries can bring benefits to farmers and consumers in the whole region. Governments must invest in biotech. research to help farmers, and the public and private sectors must work as partners.

4.5. Decision Making Support Models
Water is essential to life, development and the environment, and the three must be managed together, not sequentially. Research, public education and the management of watersheds and river basins by local communities can make this possible. Each water community, as part of the water planning process, should consider how much water to allocate to the natural environment that provides them with water for life. Decision-support models are available for this, in the form of the Water Allocation and Management Planning process, and experience using them should be observed carefully for their efficacy and with a view to applying the lessons learned elsewhere. International and national legislation should require this, as it does already in Australia and South Africa and should be developed in Middle East to assist the decision-makers to make the right choice.

4.6. Package of Solutions
The shift away from attempts at food self-sufficiency to a policy of self-reliance and food security, heavily inter-linked with the progress towards greater regional security, must also be complemented by other measures. There is no miracle cure to the region's water shortage, but a package of solutions including: improved agricultural efficiency "more crops per drop", the Blue Revolution, improved water efficiency "more jobs per drop", better distribution to reduce losses, greater public awareness and participation, a commitment to water equity and rights, information sharing, and the development of new water supplies through re-use, recycling and desalination. All involve an important value and perception change, from seeing water as a commodity to be exploited, often at the expense of one's neighbours and the environment, and a source of conflict, to seeing the region's water as a shared and fragile resource to be used for the benefit of all peoples and as an avenue towards greater cooperation and trust in the region.

5. Conclusions


Green Cross is an organization which promotes value change - cultivating a more harmonious relationship between humankind and the environment - which should never be sacrificed for short-term gains. Any Peace agreement which ignores the long-term and essential concerns of these two major stakeholders, People and Nature, will be just that - a short-term gain.

What is happening in Middle East can be perceived as a laboratory of innovations in the domain of water conflict prevention and resolution. The world will use the experience gathered here because, if today the world experiences a severe crisis in water supply and sanitation-tomorrow's crisis will most probably be in food production. Because many parts of the planet do not or will not have enough water to produce their own food locally, a combination of institutional change, water saving technology and better water resources management must increase the food productivity per unit of water everywhere. In addition, regional and international trade agreements must ensure international food security so that countries can relax their objectives of national food self-sufficiency.

Changing the situation will require one or more paradigm shifts, and among the most urgent is the need for agriculture to shift from increasing land productivity to increasing water productivity. We are standing at the eve of a Blue Revolution. Water can contribute towards a lasting peace by uniting the people in the common and mutually essential pursuit of enough water for everyone and water and food security for the future.



© GCI, April 2000 / Green Cross International / Geneva / Switzerland